THE BOARD: CORONA VIRUS

INFORMATIVE: SUSTANON 250 REVIEW

SOCIAL: CELLULAR DIMINISHING RETURNS

As cells grow their ability to be able to replicate gets diminished.  The replicating process is refered to as, "mitosis".  I believe that the ability for this process to be less efficient as time passes is normal, given that potential energy is reduced due to exhaustion.  Also, the concept of work comes into play when one inputs energy in the form of nutrition into the body.  This energy is then harvested by the mitochondria and outputted durring mitosis.  Cells become strained through this process and therefore cease as they only have a limited input of energy, physical exhaustion and affected by radiation.  If we find a way to keep a constant amount of energy in these cells while addressing exhaustion and radiation we could start to find a cure for ageing.  The efficiency of cell replication is therefore important when thinking about ageing.  It is this factor or concept and radiation which could be causing ageing as radiation causes mutations to cells thus accounting for the changes in mitosis.  These changes cause the cells to mutate and replicate slower or become easier to exhaust.  Is it possible that if we stop the body from emitting radiation and supplement it with blood transfusions, we can see a therapy for ageing?  Theoretically, the cells in our bodies become less efficient as one grows older or cells become physically exhausted therefore, if supplemented with a blood transfusion from a younger donor, the body could hypothetically be reinvigorated with younger cells with more capability for mitosis thus, it would replicate at the younger person's pace.  The question here is, how much blood would need to be transfused to the host person inorder to facilitate a youthful process of mitosis?  In short we need to find a way to keep a constant amount of energy in cells, we also need to address the issue of exhaustion and lastly the mutations caused by radiation.

We could start first by determining the ideal radiation that we want the body to emit.  To do this, quantitative numbers must be taken with pertinence to radiation at each age.  Collecting these numbers would give us the ideal age at which body radiation is most therapeutic.

Secondly, we need to find a constant source of energy.  We need to do two things here.  We need to eat healthy and also keep the energy in the cells available for mitochondria and mitosis thereafter.

Lastly, we need to find a way to reduce physical strain to the cells.  If the cells get too strained it would cause them to cease.  Physical strain can cause physical changes to the cells or mutation therefore, we need to find a way to make cells function in such a way that they don't get too strained but also strained enough that they are efficient, that would thus be therapeutic.  I believe that certain disorders hold the key to what we are looking for.

Some other conventional therapy that one could look at are botulinum toxin, adenosine triphosphate and potassium iodide.  These are the starting point drugs that we need to annalyze if we are to change the view on ageing.

I figure that one of the signs that treatment for ageing is effective is a fall of body temperature.  If we can manage to reduce this temperature we are in the right direction.  The reason why the body heats up is because of the aforementioned process within the mitochondria.  Being able to create energy without expelling heat radiation could allow the cells to not expirience mutations.  There is a reason why live animals including humans age and inanimate objects don't.  One of the differences here is thermal radiation. 

CONVERSION THERAPY DISCERTATION PROPOSAL

INFORMATIVE: DERMATIX SILICONE GEL REVIEW

SOCIAL: THE PROBLEM WITH CONTEMPORARY MEDICINE

I think an issue we have in the pharmaceutical industry is the fact of the matter that conventional medicine finds ways to push medicine for a mass amount of people. They disregard treatments that are individualized opting to make money off of patenting technology that is effective on the largest amount of people. If we are to progress medicine, we as the industry should streamline individualized pharmaceuticals. We need to start treating every case as unique yet common. What I mean is that rather than treating someone with medicine that is tailored to the masses, why not treat according to an individuals unique body. This is the issue that we in contemporary medicine need to address. This is also, unfortunately and currently the less profitable way to approach medicine. But, this sort of medicine can be sustainable and profitable. We just need to streamline our services to be able to provide such services. Why not have medical buildings with all the necessities so that we can do such individualized treatments. The way our medical industry is currently fragmented is the reason why the people are not receiving the best care possible. With technology such as CRISPR available, this is a possibility. Lets safeguard our communities before other countries do. For if we do, we stand to make the most profit and therefore it’s a win win for the people and for business.

SOCIAL: THE FUTURE OF POLITICAL SCIENCE PHD

Are we missing something in the medical industry? I think we should look at the macroscopic environment and people management from the perspective of medicine. I think PHD’s should have their very own diagnosis hand book. I think these doctors of philosophy should be repurposed to see the diseases or epidemic in societies. It has been a long time that I believed that the concept of herding was a societal disease. Herding could be positive or negative. And each action of an individual can also be positive or negative. These are all interconnected. We as a society need to look at our environment and see whether the actions of its inhabitants constitute a societal disease. Furthermore, I believe that society can experience a disease if innovative products are not constantly released. This would then result in a lack of interest which then is less spending in our economy which could lead to depression. We need to produce a diagnostic book for doctors of philosophy. I believe im really just scratching the surface of this. If PHD’s had a handbook, they could therefore see what is wrong with our societies. This could prevent poverty and serve to protect the interest of the people. I think this new career is something that will require more research on the collective behaviors of society. Municipalities can employ a, “societal doctor,” to diagnose the problem. They would be able to collaborate with multidisciplinary teams in these cities to provide intervention. I think this is a new profession that will emerge as a result of instability. This type of doctor can assess behaviour and patterns in our cities. They can then plan for action by organizing people and environments. This profession has so much potential. Doctors look at disease in a particular way and that is the preceding method: assesment, diagnosis, plan, intervention, implementation and evaluation. This is the primary framework in which modern medical doctors use to diagnose disease. This can be educated to our aspiring PHD's of political science so that they can be trained to see disease in society.