INFORMATIVE: DERMATIX SILICONE GEL REVIEW

SOCIAL: THE PROBLEM WITH CONTEMPORARY MEDICINE

I think an issue we have in the pharmaceutical industry is the fact of the matter that conventional medicine finds ways to push medicine for a mass amount of people. They disregard treatments that are individualized opting to make money off of patenting technology that is effective on the largest amount of people. If we are to progress medicine, we as the industry should streamline individualized pharmaceuticals. We need to start treating every case as unique yet common. What I mean is that rather than treating someone with medicine that is tailored to the masses, why not treat according to an individuals unique body. This is the issue that we in contemporary medicine need to address. This is also, unfortunately and currently the less profitable way to approach medicine. But, this sort of medicine can be sustainable and profitable. We just need to streamline our services to be able to provide such services. Why not have medical buildings with all the necessities so that we can do such individualized treatments. The way our medical industry is currently fragmented is the reason why the people are not receiving the best care possible. With technology such as CRISPR available, this is a possibility. Lets safeguard our communities before other countries do. For if we do, we stand to make the most profit and therefore it’s a win win for the people and for business.

SOCIAL: THE FUTURE OF POLITICAL SCIENCE PHD

Are we missing something in the medical industry? I think we should look at the macroscopic environment and people management from the perspective of medicine. I think PHD’s should have their very own diagnosis hand book. I think these doctors of philosophy should be repurposed to see the diseases or epidemic in societies. It has been a long time that I believed that the concept of herding was a societal disease. Herding could be positive or negative. And each action of an individual can also be positive or negative. These are all interconnected. We as a society need to look at our environment and see whether the actions of its inhabitants constitute a societal disease. Furthermore, I believe that society can experience a disease if innovative products are not constantly released. This would then result in a lack of interest which then is less spending in our economy which could lead to depression. We need to produce a diagnostic book for doctors of philosophy. I believe im really just scratching the surface of this. If PHD’s had a handbook, they could therefore see what is wrong with our societies. This could prevent poverty and serve to protect the interest of the people. I think this new career is something that will require more research on the collective behaviors of society. Municipalities can employ a, “societal doctor,” to diagnose the problem. They would be able to collaborate with multidisciplinary teams in these cities to provide intervention. I think this is a new profession that will emerge as a result of instability. This type of doctor can assess behaviour and patterns in our cities. They can then plan for action by organizing people and environments. This profession has so much potential. Doctors look at disease in a particular way and that is the preceding method: assesment, diagnosis, plan, intervention, implementation and evaluation. This is the primary framework in which modern medical doctors use to diagnose disease. This can be educated to our aspiring PHD's of political science so that they can be trained to see disease in society.